NARENDRA KUMAR PANDEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,RAJ KUMAR GUPTA — WPS/1353/2021

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010052382021

Filing Number

WPS/2959/2021

Filing Date

12-Feb-2021

Registration No

WPS/1353/2021

Registration Date

22-Feb-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARENDRA KUMAR PANDEY

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR PANDEY,SANJAY KUMAR YADAV,SANJAY KUMAR YADAV, ,AKATH KUMAR YADAV,SANJAY KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,RAJ KUMAR GUPTA

  2. 2.The Forest Division Office Korba

  3. 3.The Divisional Joint Director Treasury

  4. 4.The Accounted General Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by Narendra Kumar Pandey against the State of Chhattisgarh and forest department officials. The court found that the petitioner's grievance had been redressed and accepted the state's submission that nothing remained for adjudication, thereby disposing of the petition with no objections from the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  4. 19-Mar-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF

  5. 19-Mar-2021

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

  6. 12-Feb-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/1353/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by Narendra Kumar Pandey against the State of Chhattisgarh and forest department officials. The court found that the petitioner's grievance had been redressed and accepted the state's submission that nothing remained for adjudication, thereby disposing of the petition with no objections from the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case