BUDHRAM vs RAMESHWAR — MAC/366/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010050272026

Filing Number

MAC/2885/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

MAC/366/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BUDHRAM

    Adv. Jitendra Kumar Saxena,MD. ALTOMAS ZAHEER ALI,MD. ALTOMAS ZAHEER ALI, ,DEVESH G.KELA

  2. 2.Laxmi Bai

  3. 3.Ajay Ram Tenduwa

  4. 4.Sumit Ram

  5. 5.Shivani Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHWAR

  2. 2.Gajendra Jain

  3. 3.National Insurance Company Limited

    Adv. PRAVIN KUMAR TULSYAN

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Summary: In MAC No. 366 of 2026 (Budhram vs. Rameshwar) before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the appeal was admitted on 06.02.2026 with notice issued to respondents. On the subsequent hearing dated 28.04.2026, Respondent No. 1 remained unserved and Respondent No. 2 did not appear despite service. The matter was posted along with MAC No. 884 of 2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In MAC No. 366 of 2026 (Budhram vs. Rameshwar) before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the appeal was admitted on 06.02.2026 with notice issued to respondents. On the subsequent hearing dated 28.04.2026, Respondent No. 1 remained unserved and Respondent No. 2 did not appear despite service. The matter was posted along with MAC No. 884 of 2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case