RAMSAHAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/382/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010049622026

Filing Number

CRA/2127/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRA/382/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

ADHINIYAM, 1990.MATTERS RELATING TO SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989;UNTOUCHABILITY (OFFENCES) AMENDMENT & MISC. PROVISION ACT, 1976. ( 1419 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMSAHAI

    Adv. HARSH VERMA,ANUSHKA SINGH CHOUHAN,ANUSHKA SINGH CHOUHAN, ,HAMIDA SIDDIQUI,MAHIMA CHANDRA,MAHIMA CHANDRA,MAHIMA CHANDRA

  2. 2.Ramdulare Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the appellants' appeal and granted them anticipatory bail in an SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act case. The court found that the FIR did not name the appellants as accused nor disclosed their specific role in the alleged incident, thereby establishing prima facie that they had not committed any atrocity. The court applied Supreme Court precedent holding that the absolute bar on anticipatory bail under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act does not apply when an accused demonstrates no prima facie case against them. The appellants were directed to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/382/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the appellants' appeal and granted them anticipatory bail in an SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act case. The court found that the FIR did not name the appellants as accused nor disclosed their specific role in the alleged incident, thereby establishing prima facie that they had not committed any atrocity. The court applied Supreme Court precedent holding that the absolute bar on anticipatory bail under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act does not apply when an accused demonstrates no prima facie case against them. The appellants were directed to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case