RAJESH SINGH THAKUR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1294/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010049422026

Filing Number

MCRC/2114/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1294/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH SINGH THAKUR

    Adv. SUMIT SINGH RATHORE,Manisha Yadav,Manisha Yadav, ,SONI MISHRA,SHALEENI JANGDE,DURGA MEHAR,Manisha Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Rajesh Singh Thakur, arrested for possessing 41 liters of handmade Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court allowed the bail application considering his clean criminal record, the fact that the chargesheet was already filed, and that he had been in jail since January 7, 2026, with trial likely to take considerable time. The applicant was ordered to furnish a personal bond with two sureties and comply with strict conditions including regular court attendance and no adjournments during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1294/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Rajesh Singh Thakur, arrested for possessing 41 liters of handmade Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court allowed the bail application considering his clean criminal record, the fact that the chargesheet was already filed, and that he had been in jail since January 7, 2026, with trial likely to take considerable time. The applicant was ordered to furnish a personal bond with two sureties and comply with strict conditions including regular court attendance and no adjournments during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case