SHIVAM CHOUHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1388/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010048422026

Filing Number

MCRC/2068/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1388/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVAM CHOUHAN

    Adv. RAHUL GOSWAMI,DHARMENDRA BAGHEL,DHARMENDRA BAGHEL, ,RAKSHITA MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to three applicants (Shivam Chouhan, Shailesh Singh Chouhan, and Kushal Pasi) arrested for robbery under Sections 394 and 34 IPC, considering they had been in jail since January 22, 2026, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. The court imposed strict conditions including personal bonds with two sureties each, mandatory court attendance, restrictions on seeking adjournments, and penalties for non-compliance or bail misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1388/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to three applicants (Shivam Chouhan, Shailesh Singh Chouhan, and Kushal Pasi) arrested for robbery under Sections 394 and 34 IPC, considering they had been in jail since January 22, 2026, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. The court imposed strict conditions including personal bonds with two sureties each, mandatory court attendance, restrictions on seeking adjournments, and penalties for non-compliance or bail misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case