GEETABAI vs KAUSHILYA BAI Advocate - A.G. — SA/166/2019

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010048422019

Filing Number

SA/2622/2019

Filing Date

07-Feb-2019

Registration No

SA/166/2019

Registration Date

23-Feb-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION, PARTITION AND INJUNCTION ( 1719 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GEETABAI

    Adv. Krishna Kumar Khatri,VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA,VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA, ,VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAUSHILYA BAI Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Ram Bai

  3. 3.Senharin Bai

  4. 4.Madhav Sahu

  5. 5.Bhagwat Sahu

  6. 6.Bhagwati Bai

  7. 7.Sati bai

  8. 8.Rajkumari

  9. 9.Ramsavrop

  10. 10.Ramu sahu

  11. 11.Shyamu Sahu

  12. 12.Durpati Sahu

  13. 13.State of Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Second Appeal No. 166 of 2019 (Geeta Bai vs. Kaushilya Bai) on a substantial question of law regarding whether the trial court and appellate court's findings on the sale of suit property by Kachra Bai to plaintiff Geeta Bai were perverse and contrary to evidence. Notice has been issued to respondents, with the case listed for final hearing in due course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  6. 27-Feb-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/166/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Second Appeal No. 166 of 2019 (Geeta Bai vs. Kaushilya Bai) on a substantial question of law regarding whether the trial court and appellate court's findings on the sale of suit property by Kachra Bai to plaintiff Geeta Bai were perverse and contrary to evidence. Notice has been issued to respondents, with the case listed for final hearing in due course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case