KARMAHA NISHAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1445/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010047082026

Filing Number

MCRC/2002/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1445/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARMAHA NISHAD

    Adv. ABHISHEK SARAF,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV, ,ISHWAR JAISWAL,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicant Karmaha Nishad, arrested for allegedly possessing 20 liters of Mahua liquor under the C.G. Excise Act. The court found him entitled to bail considering his lack of criminal antecedents, detention since January 25, 2026, and the likelihood of prolonged trial proceedings. Bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1445/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicant Karmaha Nishad, arrested for allegedly possessing 20 liters of Mahua liquor under the C.G. Excise Act. The court found him entitled to bail considering his lack of criminal antecedents, detention since January 25, 2026, and the likelihood of prolonged trial proceedings. Bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case