RUJHU DHOBI vs NANDKISHORE — MCC/143/2023

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010047022023

Filing Number

MCC/2781/2023

Filing Date

04-Feb-2023

Registration No

MCC/143/2023

Registration Date

03-Mar-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FILED BY INDIGENT PERSON ( 1721 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUJHU DHOBI

    Adv. Roop Ram Naik,Raj Kumar Sahu,Raj Kumar Sahu, ,MANJU NAIK,ABHISHEK SHARMA,Raj Kumar Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NANDKISHORE

    Adv. B.M. ROY 1123

  2. 2.Sadhuram

  3. 3.Smt. Gyan Bai

  4. 4.Smt. Dhyan Bai

  5. 5.Smt. Jamkunwar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: In MCC No. 143 of 2023 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, the court issued notice to respondents on the applicant's plea seeking condonation of delay in filing the petition (15/04/2026 order). The court also directed that the State be impleaded as a party to the application filed under Order 44 Rule 1 CPC for prosecution as an indigent person, and granted two weeks for the State to file its reply. The matter was listed for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2023

    Fresh Matters ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel

  4. 10-Mar-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCC/143/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In MCC No. 143 of 2023 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, the court issued notice to respondents on the applicant's plea seeking condonation of delay in filing the petition (15/04/2026 order). The court also directed that the State be impleaded as a party to the application filed under Order 44 Rule 1 CPC for prosecution as an indigent person, and granted two weeks for the State to file its reply. The matter was listed for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case