BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs RADHESHYAM — MAC/303/2020
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010044932020
Filing Number
MAC/2501/2020
Filing Date
03-Feb-2020
Registration No
MAC/303/2020
Registration Date
04-Feb-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO APPEALS FILED BY INSURANCE COMPANIES. ( 1205 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. RAJ AWASTHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.RADHESHYAM
-
2.Mahetarin Bai
-
3.Smt. Surekah Bai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company's appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs. 9,27,200 in compensation. The court held that since the insurance company failed to take adequate steps to prove the vehicle's driver lacked a valid driving license (despite an incomplete RTI response), they could not escape liability on this ground, and the tribunal's decision fastening liability on the insurer was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
15-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
08-Sep-2024
Motion Hearing Matters ( Dormant Case )
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari
-
10-Jun-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF
-
05-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
05-Feb-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2020
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/303/2020
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company's appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs. 9,27,200 in compensation. The court held that since the insurance company failed to take adequate steps to prove the vehicle's driver lacked a valid driving license (despite an incomplete RTI response), they could not escape liability on this ground, and the tribunal's decision fastening liability on the insurer was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts