ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs PARMILA SAHU Advocate - RAJKUMAR PALI, ,Amit Kumar Sahu,RAJKUMAR PALI — MAC/349/2025

Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010039542025

Filing Number

MAC/2299/2025

Filing Date

24-Jan-2025

Registration No

MAC/349/2025

Registration Date

07-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO APPEALS FILED BY INSURANCE COMPANIES. ( 1205 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. Bhola Nath Nande,Priyanshu Gupta,Priyanshu Gupta, ,S.N.NANDE,KAUSTUBH SINGH THAKUR,ABHISHEK MISHRA,Priyanshu Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARMILA SAHU Advocate - RAJKUMAR PALI, ,Amit Kumar Sahu,RAJKUMAR PALI

  2. 2.MUSKAN SAHU

  3. 3.MINOR JIVAN SAHU

  4. 4.MINOR KUMKUM SAHU

  5. 5.MINOR SONU SAHU

  6. 6.DAU RAM SAHU

  7. 7.CHANDRIKA SAHU

  8. 8.NIL KAMAL BARLEY

    Adv. RAGHVENDRA PRADHAN,SHIKHAR SHARMA PRACHI SINGH VIKRAM PRATAP

  9. 9.HITENDRA KUMAR TONDRE

  10. 10.TATA A.I.G. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. SOURABH SHARMA,TARKESHWAR NANDE PRACHI SHARMA SAURABH GUPTA HARNEET KAUR KHANUJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh partly allowed Oriental Insurance Company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award of Rs. 21,37,945, finding that neither the insurer nor the co-insurer (Tata AIG) had submitted evidence regarding policy coverage and inter se liability. The court set aside the award and remitted the case to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal for redecision on which insurer bears liability, while maintaining the earlier interim order allowing the claimants to withdraw 75% of the awarded amount deposited by Oriental Insurance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 19-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  5. 22-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  6. 12-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  7. 12-Feb-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

  8. 24-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/349/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh partly allowed Oriental Insurance Company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award of Rs. 21,37,945, finding that neither the insurer nor the co-insurer (Tata AIG) had submitted evidence regarding policy coverage and inter se liability. The court set aside the award and remitted the case to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal for redecision on which insurer bears liability, while maintaining the earlier interim order allowing the claimants to withdraw 75% of the awarded amount deposited by Oriental Insurance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case