GAYATRI CHANDRAKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,DSGI — WPC/510/2020
Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010037612020
Filing Number
WPC/2070/2020
Filing Date
28-Jan-2020
Registration No
WPC/510/2020
Registration Date
01-Feb-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION & REQUISITION MATTERS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 504 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAYATRI CHANDRAKAR
Adv. MANOJ PARANJPE,SHUBHANK TIWARI,SHUBHANK TIWARI, ,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN,Anurag Singh,Prasoon Agrawal,Bharat Sharma,Rashul bhawnani,VAISHALI MAHILONG,ANSHUL TIWARI,SHUBHANK TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,DSGI
-
2.Collector
-
3.Land Acquistion Officer/Prescribed Officer
-
4.National Highway Authority of India
Adv. VAIBHAV P.SHUKLA,KRISHNA GOPAL YADAV Jyoti Singh HIMANSHU PANDEY
-
5.Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)
-
6.National Highway Authority of India
-
7.Tahsildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
The court directed the Land Acquisition Officer to provide a hearing opportunity to petitioners who purchased land before the acquisition order, then refer any compensation disputes to civil court under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956. While holding that subsequent purchasers cannot challenge acquisition validity, the court found they deserve procedural fairness and access to statutory dispute resolution mechanisms for determining rightful compensation recipients. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2020
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
05-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
05-Feb-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/510/2020
The court directed the Land Acquisition Officer to provide a hearing opportunity to petitioners who purchased land before the acquisition order, then refer any compensation disputes to civil court under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956. While holding that subsequent purchasers cannot challenge acquisition validity, the court found they deserve procedural fairness and access to statutory dispute resolution mechanisms for determining rightful compensation recipients. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts