GULAB BHOTE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1073/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010037052026

Filing Number

MCRC/1563/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1073/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULAB BHOTE

    Adv. AMAN PANDEY,VINAMRA SHRIVASTAVA,VINAMRA SHRIVASTAVA, ,RUCHI NAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/1073/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to four applicants (Gulab Bhote, Amit Shrivastava, Mohammed Javed, and Mahadev Sahu) arrested for illegal possession and sale of narcotic medicines containing Tramadol and Dextromethorphan under NDPS Act Sections 21(B) and 27(A). The court found that while contraband was seized separately from each applicant, the quantity fell within intermediate (not commercial) quantity, investigation was complete with chargesheet filed, and applicants had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail despite prosecution objections. Bail was conditional on personal bonds with sureties and strict court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1073/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/1073/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to four applicants (Gulab Bhote, Amit Shrivastava, Mohammed Javed, and Mahadev Sahu) arrested for illegal possession and sale of narcotic medicines containing Tramadol and Dextromethorphan under NDPS Act Sections 21(B) and 27(A). The court found that while contraband was seized separately from each applicant, the quantity fell within intermediate (not commercial) quantity, investigation was complete with chargesheet filed, and applicants had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail despite prosecution objections. Bail was conditional on personal bonds with sureties and strict court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case