SAIZUDDIN vs SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, Advocate - PANKAJ SINGH — WPS/930/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010035552026

Filing Number

WPS/2052/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

WPS/930/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAIZUDDIN

    Adv. CHANDRESH SHRIVASTAVA,Anmol Sharma,Anmol Sharma, ,SURESH TANDAN,Anmol Sharma,RAKSHITA MISHRA,Anmol Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, Advocate - PANKAJ SINGH

  2. 2.The Director (Personnel)

  3. 3.The General Manager

  4. 4.Chief Manager (M)/Sub Area Manager

  5. 5.Mines Manager

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh (WPS No. 930 of 2026) granted interim relief to petitioner Saizuddin, a Class-III employee of South Eastern Coalfields Limited, by restraining the respondents from recovering alleged excess payments from his salary pending disposal of the petition. The court found merit in the petitioner's reliance on the Supreme Court judgment in State of Punjab vs. Rafiq Masih and granted three weeks' time to respondents to file their reply; the case is listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/930/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh (WPS No. 930 of 2026) granted interim relief to petitioner Saizuddin, a Class-III employee of South Eastern Coalfields Limited, by restraining the respondents from recovering alleged excess payments from his salary pending disposal of the petition. The court found merit in the petitioner's reliance on the Supreme Court judgment in State of Punjab vs. Rafiq Masih and granted three weeks' time to respondents to file their reply; the case is listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case