STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs I.C. JINDAL — WPL/43/2018
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010035242018
Filing Number
WPL/2989/2018
Filing Date
24-Jan-2018
Registration No
WPL/43/2018
Registration Date
08-Feb-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LABOUR MATTERS ( 1 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 112 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 17-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Adv. A.G.
-
2.The Assistant Director / Deputy Director,
Respondent(s)
-
1.I.C. JINDAL
-
2.(Deleted) N. K. Tiwari
Adv. R.K.VERMA,Abhishek Singh Bharos Deepak Kumar SHIVKUMAR BANJARE JHANENDRA KUMAR MAHILANG
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
Summary: In WPL No. 43 of 2018 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (State of Chhattisgarh v. I.C. Jindal), the case was adjourned on 10/04/2026. The Deputy Advocate General appeared for the State petitioners while the respondent was absent in two consecutive rounds. The court ordered the matter to be called again after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
05-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
01-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
24-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
23-Jun-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
-
13-Mar-2018
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
13-Feb-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
13-Feb-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2018
Case filed
Registration No. WPL/43/2018
Summary: In WPL No. 43 of 2018 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (State of Chhattisgarh v. I.C. Jindal), the case was adjourned on 10/04/2026. The Deputy Advocate General appeared for the State petitioners while the respondent was absent in two consecutive rounds. The court ordered the matter to be called again after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts