SHAMSHIDA BEGAM vs PRINCE MANIKPURI Advocate - Ajay Kumar Mishra — MAC/282/2019

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010033612019

Filing Number

MAC/1803/2019

Filing Date

25-Jan-2019

Registration No

MAC/282/2019

Registration Date

01-Feb-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

DRIVER / OWNERS LIABILITY MATTERS. ( 1203 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAMSHIDA BEGAM

    Adv. JITENDRA GUPTA,TARUN DANSENA,TARUN DANSENA, ,TARUN DANSENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRINCE MANIKPURI Advocate - Ajay Kumar Mishra

  2. 2.Anish Verma

  3. 3.Nandkishore Manikapuri

  4. 4.Ifco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited

    Adv. AMRITO DAS,K. Rohan Abhyuday Singh

  5. 5.Thalesh Kumar Sahu

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in MAC No. 281 of 2019 (Smt. Shamshida Begam versus Kabir Das Manikpuri) adjourned the case on 25/03/2026. The court directed that these matters be listed for final hearing expeditiously, with both appellants' and respondents' counsel present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Feb-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam ChourdiyaView PDF

  4. 06-Feb-2019

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya

  5. 25-Jan-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/282/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in MAC No. 281 of 2019 (Smt. Shamshida Begam versus Kabir Das Manikpuri) adjourned the case on 25/03/2026. The court directed that these matters be listed for final hearing expeditiously, with both appellants' and respondents' counsel present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case