KUMAR SAI CHAUHAN vs SMT. SATYALATA ANAND MIRI, Advocate - A.G. — CONT/189/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010029962026

Filing Number

CONT/1679/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

CONT/189/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 16 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 1603 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUMAR SAI CHAUHAN

    Adv. RAMESH NAYAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SATYALATA ANAND MIRI, Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Shri Gagan Jaipuriya,

  3. 3.Shri Mahadev Netam,

  4. 4.Shri Rajkumar Sahu,

  5. 5.Smt. Uma Rathore,

  6. 6.Sushree Asha Sao,

  7. 7.Smt. Mohan Kumari Sahu,

  8. 8.Smt. Babita Ratre,

  9. 9.Smt. Pramila Ajay Sahu,

  10. 10.Shri Gokul Prasad Ravate (IAS),

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: In CONT No. 189 of 2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard petitioner Kumar Sai Chauhan's contempt petition. The court issued notice to respondent No. 10 directing him to show cause within 10 days why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him, subject to payment of process fee. The case was adjourned for listing after 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONT/189/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In CONT No. 189 of 2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard petitioner Kumar Sai Chauhan's contempt petition. The court issued notice to respondent No. 10 directing him to show cause within 10 days why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him, subject to payment of process fee. The case was adjourned for listing after 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case