RAM KUMAR SHUKLA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/450/2020
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 10th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010028392020
Filing Number
WPC/1564/2020
Filing Date
21-Jan-2020
Registration No
WPC/450/2020
Registration Date
29-Jan-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 17-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM KUMAR SHUKLA
Adv. Anjinesh Shukla,RAZA ALI,RAZA ALI, ,HARI AGRAWAL,RAZA ALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Collector
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition, allowing the petitioner (Ram Kumar Shukla) to pursue his pending application before the Board of Revenue, which seeks to remove the Collector's name as "Manager" from revenue records of a private family temple. The court directed the Board of Revenue to consider the petitioner's application—including his application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act—on merits expeditiously, without expressing any opinion on the case's substantive issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
12-Feb-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
31-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
24-Mar-2020
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
31-Jan-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/450/2020
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition, allowing the petitioner (Ram Kumar Shukla) to pursue his pending application before the Board of Revenue, which seeks to remove the Collector's name as "Manager" from revenue records of a private family temple. The court directed the Board of Revenue to consider the petitioner's application—including his application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act—on merits expeditiously, without expressing any opinion on the case's substantive issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts