XYZ SMT. A. SANDHYA RAO ( FOR LEGAL AID) vs KAMDEV BURMAN — ACQA/25/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010028062026

Filing Number

ACQA/1220/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

ACQA/25/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.XYZ SMT. A. SANDHYA RAO ( FOR LEGAL AID)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMDEV BURMAN

  2. 2.State of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: ACQA No.25/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the victim's appeal challenging the acquittal of Kamdev Burman on charges of rape (IPC §376(2)(n)), obscenity (§294), and criminal intimidation (§506 Part-II). The court found the victim's testimony internally inconsistent—she denied key allegations made in her original complaint, and evidence suggested the complaint was filed due to a money dispute rather than the alleged sexual misconduct, rendering the appeal devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ACQA/25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ACQA No.25/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the victim's appeal challenging the acquittal of Kamdev Burman on charges of rape (IPC §376(2)(n)), obscenity (§294), and criminal intimidation (§506 Part-II). The court found the victim's testimony internally inconsistent—she denied key allegations made in her original complaint, and evidence suggested the complaint was filed due to a money dispute rather than the alleged sexual misconduct, rendering the appeal devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case