IN THE MATTER OF SUO MOTO PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION OFFICE REFERENCE, ,SUDEEP SHRIVASTAVA,SUDEEP SHRIVASTAVA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPPIL/2/2026

Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: CGHC010025482026

Filing Number

WPPIL/1428/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

WPPIL/2/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

LETTER PETITION & PIL MATTERS ( 8 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 812 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IN THE MATTER OF SUO MOTO PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION OFFICE REFERENCE, ,SUDEEP SHRIVASTAVA,SUDEEP SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Principal Secretary,

  3. 3.Engineer-in-Chief,

  4. 4.Collector Bilaspur

  5. 5.Commissioner,

    Adv. ANADI SHARMA

  6. 6.Chief Engineer,

  7. 7.Superintending Engineer,

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WPPIL No. 2 of 2026 High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur | Order dated 04.05.2026 The court adjourned the suo moto public interest litigation concerning inadequate fire safety infrastructure in Bilaspur (population 7.5 lakhs). The State's affidavit revealed a five-year delay in establishing a fully functional fire station due to land disputes, tendering issues, and procedural lapses. Currently, only 9 fully constructed fire stations exist across the state, with construction underway in multiple districts. The court granted District Collectors and Municipal bodies one final opportunity to comply with prior directives (dated 25.03.2026 and 27.04.2026) to identify and allot suitable land for fire station construction and maintain fire-fighting equipment. The Chief Secretary was directed to ensure strict compliance. The matter was adjourned to 23 June 2026 for filing of fresh affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPPIL/2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPPIL No. 2 of 2026 High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur | Order dated 04.05.2026 The court adjourned the suo moto public interest litigation concerning inadequate fire safety infrastructure in Bilaspur (population 7.5 lakhs). The State's affidavit revealed a five-year delay in establishing a fully functional fire station due to land disputes, tendering issues, and procedural lapses. Currently, only 9 fully constructed fire stations exist across the state, with construction underway in multiple districts. The court granted District Collectors and Municipal bodies one final opportunity to comply with prior directives (dated 25.03.2026 and 27.04.2026) to identify and allot suitable land for fire station construction and maintain fire-fighting equipment. The Chief Secretary was directed to ensure strict compliance. The matter was adjourned to 23 June 2026 for filing of fresh affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case