SUNIL KUMAR DASS RAJENDRA KUMAR PATEL, ,AMIT KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/384/2022

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010024122022

Filing Number

WPS/1334/2022

Filing Date

18-Jan-2022

Registration No

WPS/384/2022

Registration Date

19-Jan-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR DASS RAJENDRA KUMAR PATEL, ,AMIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Secretary,

  3. 3.District Education Officer,

  4. 4.Chief Municipal Officer,

  5. 5.Block Education Officer,

  6. 6.Principal,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the amendment application (I.A. No.1) in WPS No. 384 of 2022 (Sunil Kumar Dass v. State of Chhattisgarh). The petitioner was granted seven working days to rectify the description of respondent No.4, with dismissal of the petition as a consequence of non-compliance. The main petition was admitted for hearing and posted for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 29-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  5. 31-Jan-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  6. 21-Jan-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  7. 21-Jan-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

  8. 18-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/384/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the amendment application (I.A. No.1) in WPS No. 384 of 2022 (Sunil Kumar Dass v. State of Chhattisgarh). The petitioner was granted seven working days to rectify the description of respondent No.4, with dismissal of the petition as a consequence of non-compliance. The main petition was admitted for hearing and posted for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case