CHHAMAN SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1080/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010022902026
Filing Number
MCRC/1044/2026
Filing Date
14-Jan-2026
Registration No
MCRC/1080/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
NDPS Act ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHHAMAN SAHU
Adv. Anmol Sharma,NITIN BHANDEKAR,NITIN BHANDEKAR, ,Juhi Pandey,Juhi Pandey
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Chhaman Sahu, arrested for possession of 18.550 kg of ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(B)(ii)(c). The court found the seized quantity constituted intermediate quantity (less than the 20 kg commercial threshold) and considered that the chargesheet was filed, applicant had no prior NDPS conviction, and jail custody since November 2025 warranted release pending trial. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Feb-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
14-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/1080/2026
The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Chhaman Sahu, arrested for possession of 18.550 kg of ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(B)(ii)(c). The court found the seized quantity constituted intermediate quantity (less than the 20 kg commercial threshold) and considered that the chargesheet was filed, applicant had no prior NDPS conviction, and jail custody since November 2025 warranted release pending trial. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts