MANDIP SINGH vs VIJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL ( SINCE DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES Advocate - SHRAWAN AGRAWAL 1. — SA/48/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010018662026

Filing Number

SA/1014/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

SA/48/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND POSSESSION ( 1717 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANDIP SINGH

    Adv. SOURABH SAHU,SAKSHI CHHABRA,SAKSHI CHHABRA, ,MALAY SHRIVASTAVA,KAJAL CHANDRA,ANU MISHRA,SAKSHI CHHABRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL ( SINCE DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES Advocate - SHRAWAN AGRAWAL 1.

  2. 2.(a) Manoj Agrawal1.

  3. 3.(b) Sharad Agrawal1.

  4. 4.(c) Smt. Nilima Agrawal1.

  5. 5.(d) Mus. Kanta Agrawal

  6. 6.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: In SA No. 48 of 2026 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (Mandip Singh versus Vijay Kumar Agrawal), the case was adjourned on 23/03/2026. The appellant's counsel requested a pass over as the arguing counsel was engaged in another matter before a coordinate bench, and the court granted the adjournment. The case has been listed for hearing after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/48/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In SA No. 48 of 2026 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (Mandip Singh versus Vijay Kumar Agrawal), the case was adjourned on 23/03/2026. The appellant's counsel requested a pass over as the arguing counsel was engaged in another matter before a coordinate bench, and the court granted the adjournment. The case has been listed for hearing after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case