SHOBHARAM vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,A.G. — WPC/429/2021

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010018202021

Filing Number

WPC/957/2021

Filing Date

15-Jan-2021

Registration No

WPC/429/2021

Registration Date

21-Jan-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND ACQUISITION & REQUISITION MATTERS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHOBHARAM

    Adv. KAMAL KISHOR PATEL,Vinod Kumar Chandra,Vinod Kumar Chandra, ,Gajendra Singh,Vinod Kumar Chandra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,A.G.

  2. 2.Project Director National Highway Authority of India (NHAI)

    Adv. ALI ASGAR,UTKARSH RAI

  3. 3.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  4. 4.Collector

  5. 5.Sub-Divisional Officer Cum Competent Authority

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: In WPC No. 429/2021, the High Court of Chhattisgarh deferred the hearing for four weeks (to July 2026). The petitioner's counsel submitted that identical matters are pending before the Supreme Court and a Division Bench of the High Court, seeking time to address arguments. The court accepted this submission and adjourned the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 08-Jun-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF

  5. 03-Feb-2021

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

  6. 02-Feb-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF

  7. 15-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/429/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WPC No. 429/2021, the High Court of Chhattisgarh deferred the hearing for four weeks (to July 2026). The petitioner's counsel submitted that identical matters are pending before the Supreme Court and a Division Bench of the High Court, seeking time to address arguments. The court accepted this submission and adjourned the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case