MANOJ KUMAR AGRAWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/360/2025

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010017142025

Filing Number

WPC/975/2025

Filing Date

10-Jan-2025

Registration No

WPC/360/2025

Registration Date

16-Jan-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR AGRAWAL

    Adv. GURUDEV I.SHARAN,ANEMESH PATHAK,ANEMESH PATHAK, ,MANEE RAM YADAV,AMRITO DAS,YASHRAJ VERMA,YASHRAJ VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETY

  4. 4.THE JOINT REGISTRAR

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR

  6. 6.MADIKANT AGRAWAL

    Adv. Ravindra Sharma,Amrita Sharma MAYA SINGH RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI ANSHIT SINGH HORA AKASH AGRAWAL SAUMYA VAISHNAV SAHIL SAHU

  7. 7.SMT. VRINDABAI/ NARAD PRASAD

    Adv. CHANDRABHUSHAN KESHARWANI,MANDWI BHARADWAJ

  8. 8.GANESH RAM

  9. 9.GHANSHYAM / PURIRAM

  10. 10.SHRI LAXMI KUMAR

  11. 11.KALURAM

  12. 12.JAWAHAR

  13. 13.SMT. TERAS BAI

  14. 14.Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Korbi

    Adv. Amrita Sharma,ANSHIT SINGH HORA AKASH AGRAWAL SAHIL SAHU SAUMYA VAISHNAV Ravindra Sharma RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition challenging a Tribunal's remand order, holding that the Tribunal correctly remitted the matter to the First Appellate Authority (respondent No. 4) for redecision since the cooperative society itself, a necessary party whose affairs were directly affected by the order, had not been impleaded before the appellate authority. The court affirmed that non-impleadment of a necessary party violates natural justice principles and mandated the First Appellate Authority to redecide the appeal within 90 days after properly impleading all necessary parties, including the society through its authorized officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  9. 28-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  13. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  14. 28-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  15. 20-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  16. 20-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 10-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/360/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition challenging a Tribunal's remand order, holding that the Tribunal correctly remitted the matter to the First Appellate Authority (respondent No. 4) for redecision since the cooperative society itself, a necessary party whose affairs were directly affected by the order, had not been impleaded before the appellate authority. The court affirmed that non-impleadment of a necessary party violates natural justice principles and mandated the First Appellate Authority to redecide the appeal within 90 days after properly impleading all necessary parties, including the society through its authorized officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case