RAVISHANKAR TIWARI vs PREM LAL SAHU — WP227/187/2026
Disposed: Contested--NON PROSECUTION on 25th March 2026.
CNR: CGHC010013922026
Filing Number
WP227/740/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP227/187/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--NON PROSECUTION
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVISHANKAR TIWARI
Adv. CHANDRIKADITYA PANDEY,ABHIPREET BAJPAI,ABHIPREET BAJPAI, ,ANURAG BAJPAI,Kanhaiya Ram Yadav,Virendra Verma,Virendra Verma
Respondent(s)
-
1.PREM LAL SAHU
-
2.Rajni Tiwari
-
3.Lomesh Tiwari
-
4.Kumud Tiwari
-
5.Basant Kumar Pandey
-
6.Biras Bai Khute
-
7.Roshan Kashyap
-
8.Bhagwat Prasad
-
9.Patel Lal Singh
-
10.Parshad Banshilal Mahilange
-
11.Shivganes Sidar
-
12.Patwari Budhwar Sao
-
13.Tahsildar
-
14.Tahsildar
-
15.Collector
Adv. A.G.
-
16.Chief General Manager
-
17.Chairman-cum-Managing Director
-
18.Senior Manager Personnel/ Service
-
19.Nodal Officer
-
20.Survey Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Ravishankar Tiwari for want of prosecution on 25 March 2026. The petitioner failed to appear or provide any representation in two consecutive hearings, leaving the court with no alternative but to dismiss the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP227/187/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Ravishankar Tiwari for want of prosecution on 25 March 2026. The petitioner failed to appear or provide any representation in two consecutive hearings, leaving the court with no alternative but to dismiss the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts