UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs AJIT KUMAR LAKDA Advocate - ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA — MAC/261/2022

Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: CGHC010013752022

Filing Number

MAC/746/2022

Filing Date

10-Jan-2022

Registration No

MAC/261/2022

Registration Date

16-Feb-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO APPEALS FILED BY INSURANCE COMPANIES. ( 1205 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. DASHRATH GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJIT KUMAR LAKDA Advocate - ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA

  2. 2.Sushil Kumar Lakda

  3. 3.Nirmala Shukla @ Nirmala Lakda

  4. 4.Rakesh Kumar

  5. 5.Manjula

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    On 06/05/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned MAC No. 261/2022 (United India Insurance Company Limited v. Ajit Kumar Lakda & Ors.) to be listed together with related cases MAC Nos. 829/2021, 258/2022, and 835/2021. The appellant was absent while respondents' advocate appeared. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2022

    For Orders [On Office Notes] ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

  4. 01-Apr-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF

  5. 18-Feb-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  6. 18-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/261/2022

casestatus.in Summary

On 06/05/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned MAC No. 261/2022 (United India Insurance Company Limited v. Ajit Kumar Lakda & Ors.) to be listed together with related cases MAC Nos. 829/2021, 258/2022, and 835/2021. The appellant was absent while respondents' advocate appeared. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case