ARUN KUMAR SAHU vs THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR Advocate - DR. SAURABH KUMAR PANDE — MA/25/2026
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010012522026
Filing Number
MA/671/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
MA/25/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN KUMAR SAHU
Adv. KHUSHBOO NARESH DUA,SOMAYA GUPTA,SOMAYA GUPTA, ,SHRISTI UPADHYAY,SHRISTI UPADHYAY,SOMAYA GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR Advocate - DR. SAURABH KUMAR PANDE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed appeals by nine family members challenging the attachment of their properties worth Rs. 5.52 crores in a coal extortion and money laundering case. The Court held that properties acquired even before the alleged crime period can be attached under the PMLA as "value thereof" when actual proceeds of crime are unavailable, and that the appellants failed to rebut statutory presumptions regarding proceeds of crime involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MA/25/2026
Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed appeals by nine family members challenging the attachment of their properties worth Rs. 5.52 crores in a coal extortion and money laundering case. The Court held that properties acquired even before the alleged crime period can be attached under the PMLA as "value thereof" when actual proceeds of crime are unavailable, and that the appellants failed to rebut statutory presumptions regarding proceeds of crime involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts