BALRAM SAHU A. K. PRASAD, ,RISHIKANT MAHOBIA,RISHIKANT MAHOBIA,AMAN KESHARWANI,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/375/2021
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010011352021
Filing Number
WPS/536/2021
Filing Date
11-Jan-2021
Registration No
WPS/375/2021
Registration Date
14-Jan-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALRAM SAHU A. K. PRASAD, ,RISHIKANT MAHOBIA,RISHIKANT MAHOBIA,AMAN KESHARWANI,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The District Education Officer
-
3.Joint Director
-
4.The Principal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Balram Sahu's petition, quashing the recovery order dated 11.12.2020 that sought to recover Rs. 98,406 for erroneously granted advance increments. The court found that as a Class III employee who received the benefit for 11 years without misrepresentation or fraud, recovery would be iniquitous under Supreme Court precedent (Rafiq Masih), and directed refund with 6% interest per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
29-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
-
29-Apr-2025
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
22-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
-
11-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
05-Apr-2021
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
05-Feb-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
05-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/375/2021
The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Balram Sahu's petition, quashing the recovery order dated 11.12.2020 that sought to recover Rs. 98,406 for erroneously granted advance increments. The court found that as a Class III employee who received the benefit for 11 years without misrepresentation or fraud, recovery would be iniquitous under Supreme Court precedent (Rafiq Masih), and directed refund with 6% interest per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts