CHHOTULAL BANJARE vs MITHUN BHOI — MAC/185/2019

Status: Final Disposal/Final Hearing. Next hearing: : -.

Final Disposal/Final Hearing Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010009182019

Filing Number

MAC/418/2019

Filing Date

07-Jan-2019

Registration No

MAC/185/2019

Registration Date

21-Jan-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHOTULAL BANJARE

    Adv. Supriya Upasane,Tanuj Patwardhan,Tanuj Patwardhan, ,Tanuj Patwardhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MITHUN BHOI

  2. 2.Pradeep Kumar Agrawal

  3. 3.The Branch Manager

    Adv. SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA Sharad Mishra

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: In MAC No. 185 of 2019 (Chhotulal Banjare v. Mithun Bhoi) at the High Court of Chhattisgarh, the case was adjourned on 23/03/2026. The appellant failed to appear in two consecutive rounds, while the respondent-State was represented by Panel Lawyer Sharad Mishra. The court directed that records be called and the matter be listed along with the records for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  4. 23-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  5. 28-Jan-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam ChourdiyaView PDF

  6. 28-Jan-2019

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya

  7. 07-Jan-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/185/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In MAC No. 185 of 2019 (Chhotulal Banjare v. Mithun Bhoi) at the High Court of Chhattisgarh, the case was adjourned on 23/03/2026. The appellant failed to appear in two consecutive rounds, while the respondent-State was represented by Panel Lawyer Sharad Mishra. The court directed that records be called and the matter be listed along with the records for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case