KUMARI ANSHU ABROL vs PRADEEP KUMAR ABROL — WP227/58/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010008592026

Filing Number

WP227/475/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP227/58/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUMARI ANSHU ABROL

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR SONI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEP KUMAR ABROL

    Adv. ,RAKSHITA MISHRA,CHANDRESH SHRIVASTAVA,CHANDRESH SHRIVASTAVA,CHANDRESH SHRIVASTAVA 1123

  2. 2.Geeta Bala Abrol

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Kumari Anshu Abrol's plea seeking expeditious disposal of her pending maintenance application under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 against her father. The court directed the Family Court, Bilaspur to conclude proceedings within six months, strictly prohibiting unnecessary adjournments and requiring full cooperation from both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/58/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Kumari Anshu Abrol's plea seeking expeditious disposal of her pending maintenance application under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 against her father. The court directed the Family Court, Bilaspur to conclude proceedings within six months, strictly prohibiting unnecessary adjournments and requiring full cooperation from both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case