SHIVPRASAD BHAGAT vs ABHISHEK SHARMA — CRR/49/2026
Status: Orders on IAs. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010006072026
Filing Number
CRR/266/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRR/49/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. ( 1427 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVPRASAD BHAGAT
Adv. RISHIKANT MAHOBIA, ,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK SHARMA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the Criminal Revision and granted bail to the applicant (convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act with a 6-month sentence) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, suspending the jail sentence till final disposal. The applicant was directed to deposit 50% of the compensation amount (Rs. 1,62,500) within 60 days, with the remaining recovery stayed till case conclusion. A subsequent order (April 2026) condoned the applicant's non-appearance and delay in process fee payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
13-Jan-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRR/49/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the Criminal Revision and granted bail to the applicant (convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act with a 6-month sentence) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, suspending the jail sentence till final disposal. The applicant was directed to deposit 50% of the compensation amount (Rs. 1,62,500) within 60 days, with the remaining recovery stayed till case conclusion. A subsequent order (April 2026) condoned the applicant's non-appearance and delay in process fee payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts