Govindram vs LAXMI DEWANGAN Advocate - RAJENDRA TRIPATHI — WP227/64/2025

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010005862025

Filing Number

WP227/316/2025

Filing Date

03-Jan-2025

Registration No

WP227/64/2025

Registration Date

17-Jan-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govindram

    Adv. MANOJ KUMAR SINHA,DILIP KUMAR JAISWAL,DILIP KUMAR JAISWAL, ,DILIP KUMAR JAISWAL

  2. 2.Vidyadhar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMI DEWANGAN Advocate - RAJENDRA TRIPATHI

  2. 2.Bhupendra Dewangan

  3. 3.Onkar Dewangan

  4. 4.Poonam Dewangan

  5. 5.Subhash Dewangan

    Adv. ANKIT SINGH,SOURABH SAHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Govindram and Vidyadhar, setting aside the trial court's order that had allowed Subhash Dewangan (Respondent 5) to be impleaded as a defendant in a partition suit. The court held that Subhash, a stranger to the joint family, cannot be added as a party merely on the basis of purchase agreements he executed with the defendants, as his claim is foreign to the core issue of family partition and would improperly expand the suit's scope. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  4. 19-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  5. 20-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  6. 21-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  7. 21-Jan-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

  8. 03-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/64/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Govindram and Vidyadhar, setting aside the trial court's order that had allowed Subhash Dewangan (Respondent 5) to be impleaded as a defendant in a partition suit. The court held that Subhash, a stranger to the joint family, cannot be added as a party merely on the basis of purchase agreements he executed with the defendants, as his claim is foreign to the core issue of family partition and would improperly expand the suit's scope. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case