KUMUDESHWAR SINGH (Dead)(Legal Heir) vs Deleted (MANHARAN) Advocate - A.G. — SA/63/2020

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010003502020

Filing Number

SA/158/2020

Filing Date

03-Jan-2020

Registration No

SA/63/2020

Registration Date

20-Jan-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION ( 1716 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUMUDESHWAR SINGH (Dead)(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Anushree Mishra,AMIT KUMAR,AMIT KUMAR, ,SOURABH SONWANI,SOURABH SONWANI,AMIT KUMAR1.

  2. 2.(a) Ashwani Kumar Singh1.

  3. 3.(b) Sobha Singh1.

  4. 4.(c) Sachi Singh1.

  5. 5.Deleted (d) Laxmi Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deleted (MANHARAN) Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Deleted (Sukhsagar)

  3. 3.Kadam (Dead)(Legal Heir)3.

  4. 4.(a) Manaharan3.

  5. 5.(b) Sukhsagar3.

  6. 6.(c) Dilharan3.

  7. 7.(d) Budhram3.

  8. 8.(e) Minabai3.

  9. 9.(f) Pyari3.

  10. 10.(g) Santoshi

  11. 11.State of Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the second appeal under Section 100 CPC filed by the plaintiff challenging concurrent findings by both lower courts that the plaintiff failed to establish title over disputed ancestral joint family property due to insufficient documentary evidence. The Court held no substantial question of law arose, as the case involved re-appreciation of facts rather than legal questions, and concurrent findings cannot be disturbed unless shown to be perverse or against law, which the appellant failed to demonstrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  5. 16-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  6. 17-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  7. 21-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  8. 07-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  9. 09-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  10. 20-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  11. 19-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  12. 11-Aug-2022

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel

  13. 07-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF

  14. 07-Jul-2022

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  15. 01-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  16. 17-Feb-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  17. 23-Jan-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  18. 23-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 03-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/63/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the second appeal under Section 100 CPC filed by the plaintiff challenging concurrent findings by both lower courts that the plaintiff failed to establish title over disputed ancestral joint family property due to insufficient documentary evidence. The Court held no substantial question of law arose, as the case involved re-appreciation of facts rather than legal questions, and concurrent findings cannot be disturbed unless shown to be perverse or against law, which the appellant failed to demonstrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case