MALAYALI SETTLERS ASSOCIATION SAKET KUMAR, SARELA RATNAM vs ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION (UT) — WPA/619/2025

Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCP0011022025

Filing Number

WPA/619/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

WPA/619/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MALAYALI SETTLERS ASSOCIATION SAKET KUMAR, SARELA RATNAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION (UT)

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF

    SUMMARY: In WPA/619/2025, the High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Port Blair) accepted the respondents' affidavit-in-opposition despite late filing, finding sufficient explanation for the delay due to administrative reasons. The court extended the time for filing affidavit-in-reply by two weeks and adjourned the matter for hearing before the next available Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Arindam Mukherjee

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Arindam MukherjeeView PDF

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/619/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: In WPA/619/2025, the High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Port Blair) accepted the respondents' affidavit-in-opposition despite late filing, finding sufficient explanation for the delay due to administrative reasons. The court extended the time for filing affidavit-in-reply by two weeks and adjourned the matter for hearing before the next available Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case