DR. SABEELA BANU CHENBEN G.BINNU KUMAR, VINITA DEVI vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WP.CT/54/2025
Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0009812025
Filing Number
WP.CT /54/2025
Filing Date
21-11-2025
Registration No
WP.CT /54/2025
Registration Date
21-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DR. SABEELA BANU CHENBEN G.BINNU KUMAR, VINITA DEVI
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
THE UNION PUBIC SERVICE COMMISSION
THE LT.GOVERNOR
THE CHIEF SECRETARY
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HEALTH)
THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
NEW MOTION
TO BE MENTIONED
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-11-2025 | NEW MOTION | |
| 20-04-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED | |
| 17-04-2026 | MOTION | |
| 16-04-2026 | MOTION | |
| 12-03-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed three writ petitions by medical officers seeking regularisation of their ad hoc service from their initial appointment date. The court held that the regularisation issue was conclusively decided by the Central Administrative Tribunal in 2004 and affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2012, barring fresh litigation under the doctrine of res judicata. The petitioners, who were excluded from regularisation due to limited vacancies (12 positions for 15 candidates), later obtained regular appointments under the 1997 Recruitment Rules in 2016; the court found they cannot now claim regularisation of earlier ad hoc service across different recruitment rule regimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed three writ petitions by medical officers seeking regularisation of their ad hoc service from their initial appointment date. The court held that the regularisation issue was conclusively decided by the Central Administrative Tribunal in 2004 and affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2012, barring fresh litigation under the doctrine of res judicata. The petitioners, who were excluded from regularisation due to limited vacancies (12 positions for 15 candidates), later obtained regular appointments under the 1997 Recruitment Rules in 2016; the court found they cannot now claim regularisation of earlier ad hoc service across different recruitment rule regimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts