DR. SABEELA BANU CHENBEN G.BINNU KUMAR, VINITA DEVI vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WP.CT/54/2025

Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCP0009812025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP.CT /54/2025

Filing Date

21-11-2025

Registration No

WP.CT /54/2025

Registration Date

21-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Section NA

Petitioner(s)

DR. SABEELA BANU CHENBEN G.BINNU KUMAR, VINITA DEVI

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

THE UNION PUBIC SERVICE COMMISSION

THE LT.GOVERNOR

THE CHIEF SECRETARY

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HEALTH)

THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

24-11-2025

NEW MOTION

20-04-2026

TO BE MENTIONED

17-04-2026

MOTION

16-04-2026

MOTION

12-03-2026

MOTION

Orders

27-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA,HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed three writ petitions by medical officers seeking regularisation of their ad hoc service from their initial appointment date. The court held that the regularisation issue was conclusively decided by the Central Administrative Tribunal in 2004 and affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2012, barring fresh litigation under the doctrine of res judicata. The petitioners, who were excluded from regularisation due to limited vacancies (12 positions for 15 candidates), later obtained regular appointments under the 1997 Recruitment Rules in 2016; the court found they cannot now claim regularisation of earlier ad hoc service across different recruitment rule regimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed three writ petitions by medical officers seeking regularisation of their ad hoc service from their initial appointment date. The court held that the regularisation issue was conclusively decided by the Central Administrative Tribunal in 2004 and affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2012, barring fresh litigation under the doctrine of res judicata. The petitioners, who were excluded from regularisation due to limited vacancies (12 positions for 15 candidates), later obtained regular appointments under the 1997 Recruitment Rules in 2016; the court found they cannot now claim regularisation of earlier ad hoc service across different recruitment rule regimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case