MR. THIRUPATI ADARSH ILANGO, DEB KUMAR BAWALI vs THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS. — WPA/311/2026

Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCP0005912026

Filing Number

WPA/311/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPA/311/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

LAND REVENUE-DISPUTES ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. THIRUPATI ADARSH ILANGO, DEB KUMAR BAWALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,

  3. 3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar MitraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA/311/2026 The petitioner challenged the classification of his purchased land as "reserve forest" and sought its diversion to "house site" status. After a previous petition (WPA/42/2026) was disposed with directions for deliberation, Respondent No. 5 rejected the application, citing that the "hilly" classification remained intact. The court found probable error in the classification, especially since adjacent plots were similarly diverted. The court adjourned the matter and directed Respondent No. 2 to file an affidavit by July 15, 2026, assessing whether the petitioner's plot was correctly or erroneously classified as "hilly," and listed the case for further consideration before the next Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/311/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA/311/2026 The petitioner challenged the classification of his purchased land as "reserve forest" and sought its diversion to "house site" status. After a previous petition (WPA/42/2026) was disposed with directions for deliberation, Respondent No. 5 rejected the application, citing that the "hilly" classification remained intact. The court found probable error in the classification, especially since adjacent plots were similarly diverted. The court adjourned the matter and directed Respondent No. 2 to file an affidavit by July 15, 2026, assessing whether the petitioner's plot was correctly or erroneously classified as "hilly," and listed the case for further consideration before the next Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case