P.KANNAN AJOY KUMAR MONDAL, ANISH BARAIK vs THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (PCCF) AND ORS. — WPA/292/2026
Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0005632026
Filing Number
WPA/292/2026
Filing Date
12-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPA/292/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.KANNAN AJOY KUMAR MONDAL, ANISH BARAIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (PCCF) AND ORS.
-
2.THE ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
-
3.THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
-
4.THE RANGE OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar MitraView PDF
Case Summary: WPA/292/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Bench) allowed the petitioner P. Kannan's writ petition against forest authorities who had seized his dinghy for carrying banned timber. After the petitioner paid the assessed fine of Rs. 50, the authorities unreasonably withheld the vessel despite repeated representations. The court directed the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's April 16, 2026 representation and release the dinghy by July 10, 2026, finding the continued seizure unjustified after payment was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra
-
12-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/292/2026
Case Summary: WPA/292/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Bench) allowed the petitioner P. Kannan's writ petition against forest authorities who had seized his dinghy for carrying banned timber. After the petitioner paid the assessed fine of Rs. 50, the authorities unreasonably withheld the vessel despite repeated representations. The court directed the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's April 16, 2026 representation and release the dinghy by July 10, 2026, finding the continued seizure unjustified after payment was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts