SHRI. G.ARUL ANAND PROHIT MOHAN LAL, SUVBRA BARMAN, PRANAY PRASUN vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ANR — WPA/271/2026

Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCP0005382026

Filing Number

WPA/271/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPA/271/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. G.ARUL ANAND PROHIT MOHAN LAL, SUVBRA BARMAN, PRANAY PRASUN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ANR

  2. 2.THE TEHSILDAR

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar MitraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA/271/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) adjourned the writ petition on June 12, 2026. The petitioner's grievance stemmed from a May 12, 2026 status quo order passed in related case RC No. 465/TSVP/2026. The court found that the petitioner in RC No. 465/TSVP/2026 had not been arrayed as a party respondent in this petition. The petitioner's counsel undertook to add this party before the next hearing. The case was adjourned to be placed before the next available Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA/271/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) adjourned the writ petition on June 12, 2026. The petitioner's grievance stemmed from a May 12, 2026 status quo order passed in related case RC No. 465/TSVP/2026. The court found that the petitioner in RC No. 465/TSVP/2026 had not been arrayed as a party respondent in this petition. The petitioner's counsel undertook to add this party before the next hearing. The case was adjourned to be placed before the next available Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case