SUDHIR KUMAR KANUNGO U PARTHA SARATHI vs UNION OF INDIA — CO/33/2026

Case under Article 227 of the Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCP0005332026

Filing Number

CO/33/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CO/33/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 227 of the Constitution of India Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDHIR KUMAR KANUNGO U PARTHA SARATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar MitraView PDF

    Case Summary: CO/33/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Port Blair) directed the Union of India to secure Rs. 20 crores via bank guarantee at 8% interest per annum (from 2007 onwards) by July 31, 2026, to prevent the respondent from exploiting a pending Section 37 appeal to delay execution of a 2007 arbitral award worth approximately Rs. 6.72 crores that had accumulated to Rs. 41 crores over 19 years. The court held that the respondent cannot be permitted to take advantage of pending litigation to deprive the petitioner of accrued rights and must allow execution proceedings to proceed before the Additional District Judge, Port Blair. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO/33/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Port Blair) directed the Union of India to secure Rs. 20 crores via bank guarantee at 8% interest per annum (from 2007 onwards) by July 31, 2026, to prevent the respondent from exploiting a pending Section 37 appeal to delay execution of a 2007 arbitral award worth approximately Rs. 6.72 crores that had accumulated to Rs. 41 crores over 19 years. The court held that the respondent cannot be permitted to take advantage of pending litigation to deprive the petitioner of accrued rights and must allow execution proceedings to proceed before the Additional District Judge, Port Blair. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case