SHRI.MUSTAFA SHEIK YASMEEN BEGUM, G.RAVI SHANKER vs THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ORS. — WPA/198/2026
Case under Electricity Act ,2003 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0004322026
Filing Number
WPA/198/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPA/198/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI.MUSTAFA SHEIK YASMEEN BEGUM, G.RAVI SHANKER
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ORS.
-
2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (HQ)
-
3.THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar MitraView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta set aside the electricity authority's September 10, 2025 rejection order for lacking reasoned grounds, finding it "cryptic" and failing to specify which requirements the petitioner didn't meet. The court directed authorities to reconsider the petitioner's application with all submitted documents by July 15, 2026, and communicate the decision by July 20, 2026, partially allowing the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Motion (Writ)
Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra
-
09-Jun-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj
-
08-Jun-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
-
27-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
-
24-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
-
23-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
-
22-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/198/2026
The High Court at Calcutta set aside the electricity authority's September 10, 2025 rejection order for lacking reasoned grounds, finding it "cryptic" and failing to specify which requirements the petitioner didn't meet. The court directed authorities to reconsider the petitioner's application with all submitted documents by July 15, 2026, and communicate the decision by July 20, 2026, partially allowing the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts