SHRI.V.RAVICHANDRAN G.BINNU KUMAR, MANISHA MONDAL, VINITA DEVI vs SHRI.SANDEEP SINGH AND ORS — MAT/69/2026
Case under Appeal Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0003382026
Filing Number
MAT /69/2026
Filing Date
27-03-2026
Registration No
MAT /69/2026
Registration Date
27-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI.V.RAVICHANDRAN G.BINNU KUMAR, MANISHA MONDAL, VINITA DEVI
Respondent(s)
SHRI.SANDEEP SINGH AND ORS
THE SECRETARY
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ORDERS
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS | |
| 22-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 21-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 20-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta allowed the appeal and expunged prejudicial observations made by the Single Judge that the demolition order "shall stand affirmed" upon dismissal of appeal, finding such observations constituted improper merit-based findings when the case should have been relegated to the statutory appellate authority. The court directed the statutory authority to independently decide the appeal on its merits within 12 weeks without being influenced by any prior observations, clarifying that the court had expressed no opinion on the demolition order's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta allowed the appeal and expunged prejudicial observations made by the Single Judge that the demolition order "shall stand affirmed" upon dismissal of appeal, finding such observations constituted improper merit-based findings when the case should have been relegated to the statutory appellate authority. The court directed the statutory authority to independently decide the appeal on its merits within 12 weeks without being influenced by any prior observations, clarifying that the court had expressed no opinion on the demolition order's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts