SHRI.V.RAVICHANDRAN G.BINNU KUMAR, MANISHA MONDAL, VINITA DEVI vs SHRI.SANDEEP SINGH AND ORS — MAT/69/2026

Case under Appeal Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCP0003382026

Filing Number

MAT/69/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

MAT/69/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Appeal Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI.V.RAVICHANDRAN G.BINNU KUMAR, MANISHA MONDAL, VINITA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI.SANDEEP SINGH AND ORS

  2. 2.THE SECRETARY

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta allowed the appeal and expunged prejudicial observations made by the Single Judge that the demolition order "shall stand affirmed" upon dismissal of appeal, finding such observations constituted improper merit-based findings when the case should have been relegated to the statutory appellate authority. The court directed the statutory authority to independently decide the appeal on its merits within 12 weeks without being influenced by any prior observations, clarifying that the court had expressed no opinion on the demolition order's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  7. 21-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  9. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  10. 16-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  11. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

  12. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAT/69/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta allowed the appeal and expunged prejudicial observations made by the Single Judge that the demolition order "shall stand affirmed" upon dismissal of appeal, finding such observations constituted improper merit-based findings when the case should have been relegated to the statutory appellate authority. The court directed the statutory authority to independently decide the appeal on its merits within 12 weeks without being influenced by any prior observations, clarifying that the court had expressed no opinion on the demolition order's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case