SMTI SUNITA ROY R KRITIKA vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS — WPA/143/2026

Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCP0003362026

Filing Number

WPA/143/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/143/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMTI SUNITA ROY R KRITIKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE SUB-REGISTRAR

  3. 3.THE TEHSILDAR

  4. 4.BISWAJIT SAHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)View PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Smti. Sunita Roy seeking registration of a sale deed for land in North Andaman. The court directed the Sub Registrar, Diglipur to complete the pending land registration within four weeks, acknowledging procedural defects existed but accepting the respondent's assurance to resolve the matter promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    New Motion

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/143/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Smti. Sunita Roy seeking registration of a sale deed for land in North Andaman. The court directed the Sub Registrar, Diglipur to complete the pending land registration within four weeks, acknowledging procedural defects existed but accepting the respondent's assurance to resolve the matter promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case