G.RADHA MOHAMMED TABRAIZ vs ANDAMAN NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION AND ANR — WPA/138/2026

Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Next hearing 16-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCP0003272026

Filing Number

WPA/138/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/138/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Money Claims/Compensation/Damages/Mesne Profits ( 33 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.RADHA MOHAMMED TABRAIZ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANDAMAN NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION AND ANR

  2. 2.THE SECRETARY

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)View PDF

    Case Adjourned for Hearing The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench at Port Blair) adjourned the petition filed by G. Radha, a widow seeking allotment of space to run a tea stall similar to seven other persons. The court directed the respondent No.2 to file an affidavit-in-opposition within two weeks and the petitioner to file a reply affidavit within one week thereafter. The matter has been listed for hearing before the next Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/138/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned for Hearing The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench at Port Blair) adjourned the petition filed by G. Radha, a widow seeking allotment of space to run a tea stall similar to seven other persons. The court directed the respondent No.2 to file an affidavit-in-opposition within two weeks and the petitioner to file a reply affidavit within one week thereafter. The matter has been listed for hearing before the next Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case