KULDEEP RAI SHARMA MOHAMMED TABRAIZ, MOHAMMED SHARUKH vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT — CRM(SB)/7/2026
Case under Prevention of Money Laundering Act ,2002 Section NA. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0003242026
Filing Number
CRM(SB)/7/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM(SB)/7/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Breach of Peace : Proceeding/preventive/prohibitory orders u/ss 107,110,144,145 Cr. P. C. ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULDEEP RAI SHARMA MOHAMMED TABRAIZ, MOHAMMED SHARUKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
-
21-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF
Case Outcome Summary: The petition (CRM(SB)/7/2026) filed by Kuldeep Rai Sharma against the Directorate of Enforcement was adjourned. The court extended the time for filing an affidavit-in-reply by three weeks to allow the petitioner to respond to the respondent's 1000-page affidavit-in-opposition. The matter has been listed for hearing in the next Circuit bench session. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
-
16-Apr-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(SB)/7/2026
Case Outcome Summary: The petition (CRM(SB)/7/2026) filed by Kuldeep Rai Sharma against the Directorate of Enforcement was adjourned. The court extended the time for filing an affidavit-in-reply by three weeks to allow the petitioner to respond to the respondent's 1000-page affidavit-in-opposition. The matter has been listed for hearing in the next Circuit bench session. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts