SHRI.RAHUL DEO MAURYA AND ORS. ARUL PRASANTH vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WP.CT/17/2026

Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: WBCHCP0003132026

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

WP.CT /17/2026

Filing Date

17-03-2026

Registration No

WP.CT /17/2026

Registration Date

17-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Acts & Sections

ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SHRI.RAHUL DEO MAURYA AND ORS. ARUL PRASANTH

SHRI.G.SUNISH KUMAR

SHRI. AMRIT LALL

Respondent(s)

THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

THE LT.GOVERNOR

THE CHIEF SECRETARY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

18-03-2026

NEW MOTION

08-06-2026

FOR HEARING

24-04-2026

FOR HEARING

16-04-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

13-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA,HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Case Adjourned for Further Proceedings The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Bench) found a prima facie case and admitted the writ petition. The court noted that while the Central Administrative Tribunal's August 2024 judgment directing service confirmation and consequential benefits was reportedly complied with, some petitioners were allegedly deprived of entitled benefits. The respondents were directed to file a detailed affidavit within one week explaining compliance for each petitioner or reasons for non-compliance. The matter is scheduled for next hearing on April 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned for Further Proceedings The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Bench) found a prima facie case and admitted the writ petition. The court noted that while the Central Administrative Tribunal's August 2024 judgment directing service confirmation and consequential benefits was reportedly complied with, some petitioners were allegedly deprived of entitled benefits. The respondents were directed to file a detailed affidavit within one week explaining compliance for each petitioner or reasons for non-compliance. The matter is scheduled for next hearing on April 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case