SMTI.KRISHNA HALDER AND ANR K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS vs THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS. — WPA /126/2026
Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0003062026
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
WPA /126/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
WPA /126/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMTI.KRISHNA HALDER AND ANR K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS
SMTI.RINA ADHIKARI
Respondent(s)
THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS.
THE CHIEF SECRETARY
THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,
THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
NEW MOTION
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | NEW MOTION | |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Orders
Summary: The interim application (CAN/1/2026) filed by Smti. Krishna Halder & Anr. seeking directions to prevent disturbance from duties was rejected. The court declined to grant interim relief, finding no material evidence of disturbances by respondents, and noted the petitioners are seasonal workers whose engagement ends 31.03.2026, distinguishing them from regularized DRMs. The court directed the respondent authority to dispose of the petitioners' pending representation for contractual extension within seven days and adjourned the matter for hearing before the next Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The interim application (CAN/1/2026) filed by Smti. Krishna Halder & Anr. seeking directions to prevent disturbance from duties was rejected. The court declined to grant interim relief, finding no material evidence of disturbances by respondents, and noted the petitioners are seasonal workers whose engagement ends 31.03.2026, distinguishing them from regularized DRMs. The court directed the respondent authority to dispose of the petitioners' pending representation for contractual extension within seven days and adjourned the matter for hearing before the next Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts