SMTI.KRISHNA HALDER AND ANR K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS vs THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS. — WPA/126/2026
Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0003062026
Filing Number
WPA/126/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/126/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMTI.KRISHNA HALDER AND ANR K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS
-
2.SMTI.RINA ADHIKARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS.
-
2.THE CHIEF SECRETARY
-
3.THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,
-
4.THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)
-
16-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)View PDF
Summary: The interim application (CAN/1/2026) filed by Smti. Krishna Halder & Anr. seeking directions to prevent disturbance from duties was rejected. The court declined to grant interim relief, finding no material evidence of disturbances by respondents, and noted the petitioners are seasonal workers whose engagement ends 31.03.2026, distinguishing them from regularized DRMs. The court directed the respondent authority to dispose of the petitioners' pending representation for contractual extension within seven days and adjourned the matter for hearing before the next Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)View PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/126/2026
Summary: The interim application (CAN/1/2026) filed by Smti. Krishna Halder & Anr. seeking directions to prevent disturbance from duties was rejected. The court declined to grant interim relief, finding no material evidence of disturbances by respondents, and noted the petitioners are seasonal workers whose engagement ends 31.03.2026, distinguishing them from regularized DRMs. The court directed the respondent authority to dispose of the petitioners' pending representation for contractual extension within seven days and adjourned the matter for hearing before the next Circuit Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts