SHRI.K.V.NARASIMHA RAO K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI vs THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS — MAT /65/2026
Case under Andaman and Nicobar Value Added Tax Regulation, 2017 Section NA. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0003002026
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
MAT /65/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
MAT /65/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
SALES TAX ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI.K.V.NARASIMHA RAO K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI
Respondent(s)
THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (VAT)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 19-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed 51 intra-court appeals against a Single Judge's order that transferred VAT assessment cases filed before August 19, 2025, to an Appellate Tribunal under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands VAT Regulation, 2017. The court upheld the Single Judge's reasoning that an alternative statutory remedy was available, rejecting appellants' arguments that assessment notices were time-barred and violated natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed 51 intra-court appeals against a Single Judge's order that transferred VAT assessment cases filed before August 19, 2025, to an Appellate Tribunal under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands VAT Regulation, 2017. The court upheld the Single Judge's reasoning that an alternative statutory remedy was available, rejecting appellants' arguments that assessment notices were time-barred and violated natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts