M/S CS EMPIRE K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI vs THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS. — MAT /61/2026

Case under Andaman and Nicobar Value Added Tax Regulation, 2017 Section NA. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCP0002962026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

17th March 2026

Filing Number

MAT /61/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Registration No

MAT /61/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

SALES TAX ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR VALUE ADDED TAX REGULATION, 2017 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

M/S CS EMPIRE K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI

Respondent(s)

THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER

THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (VAT)

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)

17-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION

19-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)

Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed 51 intra-court appeals challenging a single judge's decision that transferred VAT assessment cases to an Appellate Tribunal under the Andaman & Nicobar Islands VAT Regulation 2017, finding an alternative statutory remedy available and rejecting arguments about limitation periods and natural justice violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed 51 intra-court appeals challenging a single judge's decision that transferred VAT assessment cases to an Appellate Tribunal under the Andaman & Nicobar Islands VAT Regulation 2017, finding an alternative statutory remedy available and rejecting arguments about limitation periods and natural justice violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case