V RAVICHANDRAN K BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI vs THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AND OTHERS — MAT/53/2026
Case under Andaman and Nicobar Islands Value Added Tax Regulation, 2017 Section NA. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0002882026
Filing Number
MAT/53/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
MAT/53/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh , Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh , Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
SALES TAX ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V RAVICHANDRAN K BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AND OTHERS
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER
-
4.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (VAT)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh,hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)View PDF
Summary The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Bench) dismissed 51 intra-court appeals challenging a lower court's decision to transfer VAT assessment cases to an Appellate Tribunal rather than entertaining them as writ petitions. The court held that an adequate statutory alternative remedy exists under the VAT Regulation 2017, and therefore declined to exercise high prerogative jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh,hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)View PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh,hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)View PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh , Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh,hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee(das)View PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MAT/53/2026
Summary The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Bench) dismissed 51 intra-court appeals challenging a lower court's decision to transfer VAT assessment cases to an Appellate Tribunal rather than entertaining them as writ petitions. The court held that an adequate statutory alternative remedy exists under the VAT Regulation 2017, and therefore declined to exercise high prerogative jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts