UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAKESH KUMAR vs MS.TABASSUM SHAMSHAD AND ORS. — WP.CT/14/2026

Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCP0002692026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

16th March 2026

Filing Number

WP.CT /14/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

WP.CT /14/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Section NA

Petitioner(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAKESH KUMAR

THE CHIEF SECRETARY

THE SECRETARY (POWER)

THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (ADMN)

Respondent(s)

MS.TABASSUM SHAMSHAD AND ORS.

SMTI.SUMAN KISHEN

SMTI.HEMA DEVI

SMTI.USHA KAPOOR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

16-03-2026

NEW MOTION

20-04-2026

MOTION

17-04-2026

MOTION

16-04-2026

MOTION

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA,HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Court Decision Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision that Ms. Tabassum Shamshad must be considered for promotion to Assistant Engineer based on her seniority from appointment date (1999), not her degree acquisition date (2008). The court held that seniority and eligibility are distinct concepts; since the recruitment rules provide equal 5-year service requirements for both degree and diploma holders without preferencing earlier qualification acquisition, her senior position in the combined seniority list entitles her to promotion ahead of junior degree-holding colleagues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision that Ms. Tabassum Shamshad must be considered for promotion to Assistant Engineer based on her seniority from appointment date (1999), not her degree acquisition date (2008). The court held that seniority and eligibility are distinct concepts; since the recruitment rules provide equal 5-year service requirements for both degree and diploma holders without preferencing earlier qualification acquisition, her senior position in the combined seniority list entitles her to promotion ahead of junior degree-holding colleagues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case